The Epstein files continue to stir strong reactions.

Although much of the media attention has centered on men like Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor (formerly Prince Andrew), Donald Trump, and Peter Mandelson, it’s the women named in the massive 3.5-million-page collection who are now capturing the spotlight.

Hollywood Meets Royal Drama

The Department of Justice’s release of millions of Jeffrey Epstein files has reignited scrutiny, not just over his crimes, but also over how authorities failed to act.

The files confirm what many already suspected: Epstein’s reach extended far beyond the boardroom or private jet. And while the Department of Justice stresses that being named in the documents does not imply guilt, the sheer scope of the list has stirred conversation, especially about women.

Sarah Ferguson, Duchess of York and ex-wife of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, is mentioned multiple times in connection with social events and trips tied to Epstein.

The documents reveal just how close she had become with the disgraced financier, including emails where she calls him her “pillar.” Documents also show that Ferguson exchanged repeated emails with Epstein even during his prison sentence for child sex offenses.

Six companies linked to Ferguson are set to be closed following the latest release of Epstein-related files, according to CNN.

But the scrutiny hasn’t stopped there. Ferguson’s daughters, Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie, have also come under the spotlight in recent weeks after their names appeared in the latest tranche of files.

$17,500 per night

Amid the ongoing scandal, Ferguson is doing everything she can to stay out of public view. Sources say she has been keeping a low profile for months, especially after the newly released documents highlighted just how involved both she and her ex-husband were with Epstein.

The Daily Mail reports that Ferguson has spent much of her time at the world-renowned Paracelsus Recovery Clinic in Zurich, Switzerland — a facility she has made her temporary home for over a month. The clinic, which charges $17,500 per night, offers Ferguson the privacy, care, and medical attention she needs during this vulnerable period. Fees cover food, board, and access to specialized month-long recovery programs tailored for high-profile clients.

Each client receives care from a team of at least 15 professionals, including doctors, therapists, and specialists, along with personal amenities like a chauffeur and a private chef.

Describing itself as “discreet,” the clinic offers programs ranging from $122,000 to $154,000 per week.

Power players and philanthropists

The Epstein files also touch on major figures in philanthropy and tech. Melinda Gates appears in correspondence related to business and charitable activities — though nothing in the files suggests any wrongdoing on her part.

Hollywood is also far from untouched.

Monica Lewinsky — forever linked to one of the late 20th century’s biggest scandals — appears in passing. Former actress Meghan Markle, now the Duchess of Sussex, shows up in connection with industry events and guest lists from her acting days. And outspoken #MeToo activist Alyssa Milano is also mentioned.

Comedy and late-night TV aren’t left out. Amy Schumer, Whoopi Goldberg and Rosie O’Donnell appear briefly in the materials, mostly tied to parties, charity events, or email introductions.

The files even reach back into Hollywood’s Golden Age. Marilyn Monroe and Janis Joplin are referenced in historical context, while music legends like Diana Ross, Beyoncé, and Barbra Streisand show just how far Epstein’s social ambitions reached.

The list also includes political figures and public personalities, making it a who’s-who of influence. Some of the notable women mentioned are:

• Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
• Ashley Biden
• Chelsea Clinton
• Ashley Massaro
• Diana, Princess of Wales
• Ghislaine Maxwell
• Gloria Allred
• Hillary Clinton
• Ivanka Trump
• Jill Biden
• Kamala Harris
• Lady Victoria Hervey
• Mette-Marit, Crown Princess of Norway
• Ariane de Rothschild
• Melania Trump
• Michelle Obama
• Nancy Pelosi
• Nikki Haley
• Sarah Ferguson
• Theresa May
• Zoe Lofgren
• Naomi Campbell

…and many more.

While appearing in the files doesn’t indicate any criminal behavior, the list underscores the staggering breadth of Epstein’s connections, touching royalty, politics, Hollywood, and the music world alike.

For those watching closely, it’s a reminder that even the glittering heights of fame and influence weren’t immune to the shadow of Epstein’s orbit.

The documents connected to Jeffrey Epstein continue to draw global attention years after his death. Court filings, investigative materials, and testimony released through legal proceedings have offered insight into his finances, social connections, and criminal conduct.

However, legal authorities and journalists consistently emphasize an important distinction: appearing in Epstein-related documents does not imply involvement in wrongdoing. Many individuals are mentioned only in passing, through social contact, correspondence, or third-party references.

Understanding that distinction is essential for readers seeking reliable information rather than speculation.

What the Released Epstein Records Contain

Most publicly available Epstein-related documents originate from court proceedings involving Epstein and his associate Ghislaine Maxwell, who was convicted in 2021 on federal charges related to trafficking minors.

These records include:

• Witness depositions from civil lawsuits

• Address books and flight logs introduced as evidence

• Emails submitted during court proceedings

• Statements from victims and investigators

Because court systems aim for transparency, documents often contain names of individuals mentioned by witnesses or listed in contacts. Legal experts note that such references are not findings of fact but part of the evidentiary record.

Why Epstein’s Social Network Was So Wide

Epstein cultivated connections across business, politics, academia, and entertainment. Investigative reporting has documented that he attended conferences, charity events, and social gatherings that brought him into contact with influential individuals worldwide.

This broad social presence explains why many prominent names appear in documents linked to his activities. Journalists emphasize that these mentions typically reflect proximity or contact rather than evidence of misconduct.

Confirmed Legal Outcomes in the Epstein Case

Several key facts are firmly established through official records:

• Epstein pleaded guilty in 2008 to solicitation-related charges in Florida.

• He was arrested again in 2019 on federal trafficking charges.

• He died later that year while in custody.

• Maxwell was convicted in 2021 for her role in recruiting minors for exploitation.

Beyond those rulings, authorities have not concluded that most individuals appearing in Epstein-related documents committed crimes.

This distinction remains central to responsible reporting.

Public Figures Previously Linked Through Reporting

Media coverage has frequently referenced certain individuals whose contact with Epstein was documented. For example, Prince Andrew faced allegations in a U.S. civil lawsuit tied to Epstein’s circle. He denied the claims and later reached a settlement without admission of liability.

Such cases demonstrate how legal disputes involving Epstein’s network have sometimes involved prominent public figures, but each case depends on evidence presented in court rather than speculation.

References to Social Contacts and Public Events

Some Epstein records include references to people who attended events, exchanged emails, or appeared in contact lists. These mentions can include public figures from business, philanthropy, entertainment, or politics.

For instance, journalists have reported that Melinda French Gates had professional interactions involving philanthropy-related discussions in earlier years. There has been no finding of wrongdoing associated with those contacts.

Similarly, individuals from the entertainment industry have appeared in event guest lists or social records. Experts stress that social proximity does not equal involvement in criminal activity.

Why Court Documents Often Include Many Names

Large investigations frequently generate extensive records. In cases involving wealthy individuals with global networks, documents may reference hundreds or even thousands of people.

Legal scholars explain that these references serve several purposes:

• Establishing timelines of social contact

• Documenting communications

• Providing context for witness testimony

• Demonstrating financial or travel patterns

Because of this, documents may include individuals who were never investigated or accused of crimes.