A U.S. Navy pilot was rescued Wednesday morning after a F/A-18E Super Hornet crashed into the Atlantic Ocean off the coast of Virginia, marking yet another incident in a troubling series of aircraft losses during training exercises.

According to Navy spokesperson Lt. Jackie Parashar, the crash occurred just before 10 a.m. ET when a pilot from Strike Fighter Squadron 83 (VFA-83), based at Naval Air Station Oceana in Virginia Beach, ejected during what was described as a “routine training flight.”

Search and rescue teams immediately launched a coordinated response. The pilot was located and rescued at approximately 11:21 a.m., then transported to a local hospital for medical evaluation. The Navy has not yet disclosed the pilot’s identity or condition, pending further updates.

The F/A-18E Super Hornet, a single-seat multirole fighter known for its versatility and endurance, has not been recovered from the water, and the cause of the crash remains under investigation.

A Disturbing Trend: Six F/A-18 Incidents in Ten Months

This latest crash marks the sixth loss of a Navy F/A-18 aircraft in less than a year, a statistic that has raised concern within defense and aviation communities about potential maintenance, procedural, or mechanical issues in the aging Super Hornet fleet.

The series of incidents began in October 2024, when tragedy struck near Mount Rainier in Washington State. Two naval aviators were killed after their EA-18G Growler, a specialized electronic warfare variant of the Super Hornet, crashed during a routine training exercise. The investigation pointed to difficult weather conditions, though final conclusions have not been publicly released.

Two months later, in December 2024, another Super Hornet was lost under dramatically different circumstances. While deployed in the Red Sea aboard the USS Harry S. Truman, the aircraft was accidentally shot down by friendly fire from the guided missile cruiser USS Gettysburg. Both pilots successfully ejected and were recovered safely, but the rare incident underscored how high-stakes naval operations can turn dangerous even outside combat zones.

Then in February 2025, a Growler went down in San Diego Bay, close to Naval Base Coronado. Eyewitnesses described a fiery descent before the aircraft struck the water. Both crew members ejected in time and were rescued by a nearby charter fishing boat, an unusual but fortunate twist in what could have been another deadly episode.

The Navy’s run of bad luck continued in April 2025, when a Super Hornet fell overboard from the USS Harry S. Truman. At the time, the jet was being towed into a hangar bay, but it rolled unexpectedly and slipped into the Red Sea. No one was injured, but the loss added another multimillion-dollar blow to the fleet’s maintenance record.

Just a week later, another Super Hornet was lost during a landing attempt on the same carrier. The Navy confirmed that the aircraft’s arresting gear system — the crucial mechanism that “catches” fighter jets as they land on the narrow deck — malfunctioned, causing the jet to overshoot and plunge overboard. Both pilots were able to eject and were recovered safely.

Now, with the latest crash off Virginia, the U.S. Navy faces mounting questions about the reliability of its F/A-18 fleet and the risks associated with intensive training operations.

The Cost of Training and Readiness

The Boeing F/A-18E Super Hornet is one of the Navy’s most important aircraft — a mainstay of its carrier air wings since it entered service in the late 1990s. Each jet carries a production cost of roughly $67 million, excluding additional maintenance, weapons, and operational expenses.

Designed for versatility, the Super Hornet performs everything from air-to-air combat to precision ground strikes. But the fleet’s expanding workload, combined with the Navy’s shift toward newer aircraft such as the F-35C Lightning II, has put increased strain on maintenance schedules and parts supply chains.

Experts note that the majority of crashes over the past year occurred during training, not combat, suggesting that mechanical fatigue, environmental conditions, or procedural errors may be key factors. The Navy’s intensive operational tempo — balancing global deployments with frequent readiness exercises — leaves little downtime for extensive overhauls.

“The F/A-18 platform remains critical to naval aviation,” said a former Navy flight instructor who spoke under anonymity. “But like any aging system, the more you push it, the more maintenance and inspection cycles become essential. These recent incidents could point to systemic wear that needs urgent attention.”

Human Factors and Safety Reforms

While aviation mishaps are an unfortunate reality of military training, the cluster of recent F/A-18 accidents has prompted internal safety reviews. Each crash triggers an investigation led by the Naval Safety Center, which examines flight data, pilot actions, maintenance logs, and environmental conditions to determine cause.

The Navy has not publicly released findings from most of these recent incidents, citing ongoing reviews. However, recurring patterns — including mishaps during carrier operations and training exercises — have already led to temporary pauses in flight schedules, known as “safety stand-downs,” allowing squadrons to conduct maintenance checks and retraining.

Pilot safety protocols have also evolved. The Martin-Baker ejection system used in the F/A-18 has repeatedly proven life-saving, with pilots surviving even high-speed, low-altitude incidents. The most recent crash again highlights the effectiveness of this technology, with the pilot safely recovered from the Atlantic just over an hour after ejection.

Still, every incident is a reminder of the inherent dangers of naval aviation, where even routine missions involve launching and landing on moving ships, navigating variable weather, and performing complex maneuvers under immense physical and mental strain.

A Pattern That Demands Answers

The Navy has not suggested a single unifying cause behind the six Super Hornet losses, but defense analysts say the pattern demands scrutiny. Some point to increased training intensity amid global tensions, while others highlight logistical and maintenance challenges tied to operating aircraft both on land and at sea.

“The fleet is stretched thin,” said Dr. Alicia Monroe, an aerospace analyst at the Center for Defense Strategy. “The Navy’s readiness levels are high, but these incidents may reflect the stress of maintaining older aircraft at operational tempo levels originally designed for peacetime.”

The F/A-18E/F models are expected to remain in service for years, even as newer fighters join the fleet. That makes maintenance, upgrades, and pilot training all the more critical. The Navy has already committed billions to extending the life cycle of existing Hornets through structural reinforcements and avionics modernization — but those efforts take time.

Moving Forward

For now, investigators are focused on recovering the downed aircraft off the Virginia coast and analyzing flight data to determine what went wrong. The Navy has not indicated whether environmental factors — such as weather or bird strikes — may have played a role.

As of Thursday, Strike Fighter Squadron 83 operations remain suspended pending further review. The squadron, nicknamed the “Rampagers,” has a distinguished history within the Navy, having flown combat missions in Iraq and Afghanistan.

While no loss of life occurred in this latest crash, the incident underscores the perils of maintaining combat readiness through high-intensity training and the increasing cost — in both dollars and risk — of preserving America’s air superiority.

Each of the six F/A-18 losses in the past ten months has become part of a sobering statistic — one that the Navy cannot afford to ignore as it looks toward the next generation of carrier-based aviation.

Sources:

• CBS News — “Pilot Rescued After Navy Fighter Jet Crashes Off Coast of Virginia”

• U.S. Navy Public Affairs Office — Official Statement, Naval Air Station Oceana

• Defense News — “Six Super Hornet Losses Raise Questions About Maintenance and Training Safety”

• Aviation Week — “U.S. Navy Examines F/A-18 Reliability Amid Increased Flight Operations”